Discourse with an Atheist Who Beleives That Gos Does Not Exist Essay

Discourse with an Atheist Who Beleives That Gos Does Not Exist - Essay ExampleFor instance, organic evolution does not explain the forces that combined the hydrogen and oxygen molecules and dust particles to form the primordial cell. Likewise, the causes and reacting elements that triggered the Big Bang or the stars withdrawal of elements from the sun, as is alleged in the Star-Tidal theory are not cogently identified in non-creationist theories. Even non-creationist theories have to take a leap of faith in canvas the origin of life forms (Mongrain, 2011, 205). Contrary to the above, no one can repudiate the fact that the world, the universe and life forms are too complex to have been brought well-nigh by random chance. The intricate network of the blood vessels in mammals (especially cosmos), the universal order and mans linguistic capabilities, are just some of the indicators of an wakeless Being who must have designed the universe. Had the Star-Tidal or the Big Bang incident brought the universe and life forms into existence, chances for this striking order would be zero (1/?). Logically, if divinity exists, then His interactions with His creation will be inevitable, and the vestiges of these interactions may also be notable. Still, these requirements are consistent with the Biblical notion of Gods existence. Particularly, there are indicators of the universal or the Noahic flood, just as the Bible alleges that the flood took place around 4,300 BC. For instance, the multiple sources and traditions of the worldwide deluge as is seen in the Epic of Gilgamesh, the set up Veda and Ovids Metamorphosis and the Chineses Book of Knowledge, among others provide the Noahic flood with multiple attestations. Particularly, there are over 240 literature and traditions which mention the worldwide flood. The handsome disparities among the accounts do not really discount the plausibility of a universal flood having taken place. Instead, the numerous accounts corrobor ate it. 2) A case for rescuer train to be God and for His resurrection That Jesus claimed to be God is directly settled in many references. Some of these references include Matthew 126-8 (He refers to Himself as the Initiator of the Sabbath) Mark 21, 2, 10 (He forgives sins) Matthew 721-23 (He is the ultimate Judge who can render eternal damnation) Mathew 1433 and John 938 (He accepts worship). Conversely, Christs claim to be God is expressly seen in the instance where He takes up Gods name and therefore equating Himself with God, in John 823-4. In Exodus 312-14, God reveals Himself to Moses, with the name I AM. In His discourse with the Pharisees and the rest of the Jews, Jesus does not only claim to have preceded Abraham, entirely also takes on the name I AM (Williams, 2010, 27). In Mark 21, 2 and 10, before healing a paralytic, Jesus speaks of having forgiven the young mans sins. The Scribes and those gathered there charged (rightly) in their hearts that only God had the power to forgive sins. To validate His claim of having the power to forgive sins, Jesus heals the paralytic. The crux of the matter herein is that while it is easy for any one to claim to have the power to forgive sins, He healed the paralytic as proof to His ability to forgive sins. Logically, a mans words just before his goal are usually taken seriously, especially when the means or speaker is aware that he is on the brink of death. At this instance, an individual weighs his words and deeds carefully because of the knowledge of the irreversible nature of death and the eternal state that